Labels:book | reckoner OCR: The conviction of the petitioner was based upon an alleged modification of selector switch uo the AR-15 This modification does rot by itself, permit the AR-15 fire more than auo shot with single trigger pull. Under the holding United States Mittleider, 835 F.2d 769 (10th 1987). this modif fication becomes the sole con sideration the instant case a5 whether this AR-15 16 dangerous device such type that would alert one the likelihood regulation However, under Mittteider the government need not prove that the defendant knew of he weapon's automatic capabilities, the ment need you prave that the defendant knew that the AR-15 selector switch was filed or umop 1 the opinion this case, however, the Tenth Circuit Court goes Dne step further pur states that the defendant should have presented evide ...
(.png)
